Adam Back's emails are Fake!


Adam Back's emails are Fake!


here is why:


Since the COPA vs. Wright results came out, I would like to add some comments about it here for the public.


Court documents can be found here:


https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPA-v-Wright-Judgment.pdf

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPAv-Wright-Judgment-Appendix.pdf



Adam Back says he is not Satoshi Nakamoto, but he is going to sue someone who claimed to be.


Adam Back is part of COPA, https://www.opencrypto.org/members/ (BlockStream is listed here).


He was not involved in Bitcoin, but he got a $75 million investment with no history of Bitcoin development!


The last person who emailed Satoshi (Mike Hern) started working for Adam Back and also went to court to support Adam Back in proving Craig Wright is not Satoshi!


Somehow Adam forgot that he said he was going to delete logs that could reveal the anonymity of Satoshi Nakamoto!


"If I had logs," meaning you didn't have any logs, correct? Then where did these emails come from?


Somehow, Hashcash compiled with the same computer and the same version of MinGW and GCC compiler as the first version of Bitcoin. Somehow!

These two files

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/860db83b37d980509c60b4c62987544c4d44c3e7067f850adbe8e4c1db5632a2/details

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d108cdff2922a60e0054718a84178a40526ba00401fa34a87fb055947c77a182/details





And About Emails!


The emails are fake, that's why there were no emails before, or if there were any emails, he could have used Tor and emailed himself. That's not difficult to do.

How did Satoshi Nakamoto design Bitcoin based on Hashcash, but miss the two references mentioned in the Hashcash article? The Hashcash paper is only 7 pages; how could he have missed that?

"hashcash as a minting mechanism for Wei Dai's b-money electronic cash proposal, an electronic cash scheme without a banking interface"

This is the 2007 version of the paper. 

https://web.archive.org/web/20070714203317/http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf








In this interview released on 01/20/2020 - 16:52, you've said:


https://www.bitcoininsider.org/article/81008/adam-back-satoshi-emails-privacy-concerns-and-bitcoins-early-days





"I also sent Satoshi Ron Rivest's 1996 paper on MicroMint, which extracts k-way hash collisions instead of partial pre-images used by Bitcoin."

How did you know what tech it was using in Bitcoin when in the beginning of your email you said "sorry I didn't read your article"?

You didn't read the article, but you advised him on how to solve the problem mentioned in the article?




In the emails between you and Satoshi, he said he is working on the source code that is going to get released soon when the source files were created on 1/7/2009 and your email from 8/20/2008 ?





But you forgot something, Adam. Copying an executable file does not change its own timestamp. "mingwm10.dll" in the first version of Bitcoin compiled on 2007-08-03 but created on 1/7/2009.


This file.

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/1badf3972d9a861a69fafb2c5e3282aecc30007b9d51c199806e542b32d7708f/details




And if Satoshi tried to make it open source, these VC++ files should work on other computers, correct? As I have mentioned before, source code files in the first version of Bitcoin are useless, even though there is this comment that says it's not going to work on MSVC++, and I have tried it too, and it's not working.



The reason it's not working is simply because there is no GUI MFC files inside these source code files of first version of Bitcoin, meaning those who are debugging these files and posting bug reports to forums or the mailing list are using MinGW and working for Satoshi Nakamoto and were aware of Bitcoin before its public release!

I think it's very clear that people who said they received emails from Satoshi are those who are working with Adam Back, those who went to court to support Adam Back! Spending millions of dollars on behalf of Copa! 

I always wanted to prove that you've been working with "Hal Finney" before, but I couldn't find any documents to prove my claim. Thanks to your Hashcash paper reference, now we know why Hal Finney was the first person who received bitcoin from you, because you had personal communications.

https://web.archive.org/web/20070714203317/http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf




You may ask what is MinGW?



Thanks, Nima









Comments

  1. TY, Nima, enjoyed all the posts. At this point, maybe could be interesting to do some research about other Satoshi candidates. Nick Szabo is a nice one, he studied Austrian economics and many other stuff, created Bitgold and smart contracts, etc etc. IMO, Bitcoin is like very amazing to be created by just one man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there, I checked on him; he was not part of those who started Bitcoin.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meet the Founder of Bitcoin Adam Back aka Satoshi Nakamoto!

The Bitcoin app is vulnerable to hackers!

Why Adam Back not confirming he is the Founder of Bitcoin ? ( Part 2 )