Why Adam Back not confirming he is the Founder of Bitcoin ? ( Part 2 )
Why Dr Back is not confirming that he is Satoshi Nakamoto ?
Check my video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHnfS0k2614
I would like to let Adam Back speak about himself.
Let's check his Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Back&oldid=120281396
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Back&oldid=120273718
In 2007 when no one knew about Crypto Adam described himself as a Crypto Anarchist Leanings and Capitalist.
And then within a few hours, Adam changed his bio to Crypto Anarchist and Capitalist Leanings.
Here is the interesting part, 4 weeks after Satoshi has been disappeared from the public this information about Adam back has been removed from Adam's Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Back&dir=prev&action=history
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Back&oldid=436626208
Guess what, who did that? another Ph.D. software engineer called David Eppstein from UK trying to do a favor to his best friend Adam.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Eppstein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Eppstein
Why he remove that information from Adam's Wiki?
He said quote: "Remove unsourced opinion and extraneous detail that belongs on other pages"
What Source ? he was the source, he added those comments about himself into his Wikipedia!
But what he removed was interesting,
This is Adam Back writing about himself, quote:
"Politically he is a libertarian, a cryptoanarchist, a cypherpunk, and an anarcho-capitalist"
A crypto-anarchist?
Here is the defection of a crypto-anarchist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto-anarchism
Crypto-anarchism is a political ideology focusing on the protection of privacy, political freedom, and economic freedom.
Isn't this something like bitcoin?
Remember this was added before Bitcoin release in 2007 and removed from Adam's Wiki 4 weeks after Satoshi has been disappeared in 2011!
Why? because that's a correct description of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Adam also described himself as an anarcho-capitalist.
Do you know what capitalist means?
meaning he is looking into profit and that's exactly what he did. he created Blockstream and hired all bitcoin core engineers.
One of these bitcoin core experts was "Mike Hearn".
https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/Mike_Hearn
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Satoshi_Nakamoto&dir=prev&action=history
Mike Hearn was the person who worked on Satoshi Nakamoto Wikipedia and last person who Satoshi Nakamoto emailed to.
More about him can be found here, quote:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130219013050/http://www.bitcoin2013.com/bitcoin-2013-panelists.html
"Mike Hearn is a developer from the UK who first used Bitcoin a few months after its initial release in 2009. He now focuses his development primarily on making purely P2P smartphone wallets. Mike has a research interest in advanced uses of the Bitcoin protocol, in particular around building out the infrastructure for a completely new financial system. He lives and works in Switzerland."
It gets interesting that Mike also started working for Adam Back.
But when all bitcoin core devs are getting into the fight over bitcoin block size. he pushed out of the team over block size from the Blockstream.
Isn't interesting that the guy who added lots of information about Satoshi Nakamoto Wikipedia is starting to work for a guy who claimed who is not involved in bitcoin development?
Remember Blockstream got founded 100 Million dollars while he said he didn't mine a single bitcoin until 2013 and was not interested in crypto!
But what he has been added to his Wikipedia says something else!
In part 1 of this article, we have proven that bitcoin 0.1.0 and Hashcash 1.22 DLL liberties have been compiled with the same computer.
Let's take a look at first bitcoin core devs.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110519224228/http://www.bitcoin.org/
Gavin Andresen
Pieter Wuille
Nils Schneider
Martti Malmi
Jeff Garzik
These names have been added to Bitcoin.org in May 2011 however the compiled files from bitcoin core projects ( Ver 0.3.20 ) shows that few of those bitcoin core files have been compiled on "5/12/2009" one-year earlier and by seeing Jeff Garzik name there ( the guy who removed part 1 of this article from bitcointalk.org ) you can make sure the whole Bitcoin project and legacy of Satoshi Nakamoto and bitcoin core was a setup by Adam Back.
So what did Adam need Gavin Andersen for while he was no expertise in Crypto?
I would like to let Gavin speak about himself, Quote from his Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gavin_Andresen&oldid=567569536
It's because Gavin has lots of experience in starting and founding and that's how Blockstream received $75M on their first seed from investors.
So why Adam back is denying that he is not Satoshi.
Again I would like to let Adam Back speak about himself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Back&oldid=120319618
On his Wiki quote:
"He is also known for starting the trend of making political statements with ultra compact code -- size-hacked code -- the export-a-crypto-system .signature -- in relation to the then US export regulations preventing export of crypto software from the US. (These regulations have since been relaxed, one could speculate in some very small part because of the export-a-crypt-system effort to ridicule the then regulations)"
I believe Adam doesn't want to be involved with the US / UK export regulations.
Even when you're opening https://bitcoin.org/en/download Website it says:
(This software is presently not available for download in the UK, and download links will not work if you are located within the UK.)
and Adam Back is from UK.
Back to the first question Why Dr Back is not confirming that he is Satoshi Nakamoto?
Because if He Transfer his money from his Vault then HMRC ( HM Revenue and Customs - it's like IRS in US ) would question him regarding his potential incomes and that's why that 1 M Bitcoin is not moving from his vault!
He founded his company in Canada and he moved to Malta.
If he confirmed he is Satoshi it would end his career and he would be dealing with UK government for his Taxes and potentially gets Jail time!
It's not over yet!
Let me read this for you:
"The encrypted session key can be decrypted and verified using the same private/public key pair(s). Once verified, the decrypted session key can then be used to decrypt and verify the encrypted cookie data. A first server having the private/public key pair(s) may generate the cookie using a randomly generated session key. A second server having the same private/public key pair(s) may decrypt and verify the cookie even if the session key is not initially installed on the second server."
What are these sentences reminding you?
Yes Correct, Bitcoin!
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/adam-back
What if I tell you that Adam Back has been patenting this technology in 2005 for Microsoft.
Imagine if he confirms that he is Satoshi. Microsoft goes after him. Microsoft can claim bitcoin is invaded their patent and Bitcoin is going to $0 in one night because Bitcoin would find an owner.
That's why Dr. Back would never ever say he is Satoshi Nakamoto.
Part 3 is coming up soon.
We will review people who silencing me such as Journalists or Bitcoin Groups / Forums.
For now, you can support me here by purchasing my NFTs:
Thanks, Nima
Hey,
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your first entry I was curious so I bookmarked your blog. Indeed, Adam Back could be Satoshi. I am commenting since I see you are not getting much attention online, at least you get some feedback.
First of all, I want to thank you for your time and effort to put this together. In my opinion, this entry is just cringe, you seem to not know much about the cypherpunk and crypto-anarchist movement. The connections you are making are sooo unneedlessly complex: everyone knew Adam was a cypherpunk/cryptoanarchist since the 90s: so, what does it matter what wikipedia say? (and of course, all those terms existed way before Bitcoin!).
The line "Do you know what capitalist means?" and corresponding answer are either very funny or very cringy.
Anything that relates to asymetric cryptography sounds very "bitcoin-ish", but the even on a really quick look, the Microsoft patent as little to nothing to do with Bitcoin.
At the lack of a better candidate, I also think Adam might be Satoshi. But the connections you are making here are so weak and forced that you are making me think Adam is actually not Satoshi :D
Hey Ashly
Delete::::After reading your first entry I was curious so I bookmarked your blog. Indeed, Adam Back could be Satoshi. I am commenting since I see you are not getting much attention online, at least you get some feedback.
I'm getting lots of good feedback from the community also people who are involved in Bitcoin development.
For Example: https://hacker-news.news/post/28614776
Also, you can check my YouTube for more comments.
My Posts on Bitcointalk.org and r/ Bitcoin Reddit Got Banned but i got this :) , just wait for part 3 !
:::First of all, I want to thank you for your time and effort to put this together.
You're very welcome!
::::In my opinion, this entry is just cringe, you seem to not know much about the cypherpunk and crypto-anarchist movement.
I was following the movement since they put the king into to the Jail ! so its been long time!
::::The connections you are making are sooo unneedlessly complex: everyone knew Adam was a cypherpunk/cryptoanarchist since the 90s: so, what does it matter what wikipedia say? (and of course, all those terms existed way before Bitcoin!).
The only thing is matters is how 2 DLL files one from Hashcash 1.22 and the other one from Bitcoin's first release have complied with the same computer, that does matter!
Check Section 2 of this article
https://satoshihunter1.blogspot.com/2021/09/meet-founder-of-bitcoin-adam-back-aka.html
Also if you knew him better than us you can ask him if he can explain how that happened.
::::The line "Do you know what capitalist means?" and corresponding answer are either very funny or very cringy.Anything that relates to asymetric cryptography sounds very "bitcoin-ish",
::::but the even on a really quick look, the Microsoft patent as little to nothing to do with Bitcoin.
It does matter because if Adam comes out of the Founder it would count his personal work while he worked at Microsoft, people who worked at big tech companies knew that companies usually force you to sign an agreement regarding your personal work.
Basically, you will give them the right to own your personal work.
::::At the lack of a better candidate, I also think Adam might be Satoshi. But the connections you are making here are so weak and forced that you are making me think Adam is actually not Satoshi :D
Once i have downloaded all his projects from his website and put them all into my code hunter app it was 100% obvious to me that he designed the Bitcoin, I've been hunting hackers all my life and this wasn't complicated much!
Cheers !
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSo what if he is actually SN? Doesn't he deserve a lot more respect than this? I suggest you lay off this and delete these posts if you have any dignity left. And if you care about the bitcoin community, identifying him has no upside and a lot of downside.
ReplyDeletehm, then why are you reading this and follow topic, are you hunting Satoshi hunters :D
Delete::::So what if he is actually SN? Doesn't he deserve a lot more respect than this?
DeleteThe majority of cyber security experts and Cyberpunks know who is Nima Bagheri and what he has been achieved so far, Dr Adam Back started to devalue my reach that no one was able to achieve past 10 years.
He wanted to be a robin hood I didn’t ask him to be a hero and now you’re asking why I don’t mercy on him?
I don’t have any interest here,
He made his fortune while a lot of people lost their money overnight.
Is he going to pay for people who lost their wealth overnight?
Libeay32.dll is part of openSSL. Satoshi did not compile it
ReplyDeleteOpenSSL is a free and open source , https://www.openssl.org/source/ ,
DeleteQuote: "Each day we make a snapshot of each development branch. They can be found at https://www.openssl.org/source/snapshot/. These daily snapshots of the source tree are provided for convenience only and not even guaranteed to compile."
So you need to compile it if you like to use it for your project.
+1, OP is clueless and doesn't know how DLLs work.
DeletePlease do respect other people, thanks
Delete"The only thing that matters is how 2 DLL files one from Hashcash 1.22 and the other one from Bitcoin's first release have complied with the same computer, that does matter!"
ReplyDeleteThank you.
Can't wait part 3 :)
Yeah that's true Dan, thanks
DeleteHi Danilo
DeletePart3 is here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mnwm0hQiwKU